<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Liverpool.com &#039;is no more&#039;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.liverpoolcultureblog.co.uk/2009/04/liverpoolcom-is-no-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.liverpoolcultureblog.co.uk/2009/04/liverpoolcom-is-no-more/</link>
	<description>Culture, arts, music, theatre and media in Liverpool, Capital of Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 10:44:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://www.liverpoolcultureblog.co.uk/2009/04/liverpoolcom-is-no-more/comment-page-1/#comment-385</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liverpoolcultureblog.co.uk/2009/04/liverpoolcom-is-no-more/#comment-385</guid>
		<description>Sad but true. It&#039;s a tough market place out there, and the advertising revenue just didn&#039;t stack up. I&#039;m disappointed because I still believe it was worth hunkering down and persevering in some way, especially as the response we were getting was so positive (thanks!) and our twitter/web traffic showed we were building a sizeable niche audience which, for whatever reason, the rest of the city&#039;s media was failing to connect with. My belief is this would have grown, as niche audiences are, globally, at the expense of the traditional local newspaper. In five years&#039; time, who knows what it could have become. Incidentally, it looks like the website is being updated, but, it should be pointed out, not by your ex-Liverpool.com team. Best stick to reading this blog instead then!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sad but true. It&#8217;s a tough market place out there, and the advertising revenue just didn&#8217;t stack up. I&#8217;m disappointed because I still believe it was worth hunkering down and persevering in some way, especially as the response we were getting was so positive (thanks!) and our twitter/web traffic showed we were building a sizeable niche audience which, for whatever reason, the rest of the city&#8217;s media was failing to connect with. My belief is this would have grown, as niche audiences are, globally, at the expense of the traditional local newspaper. In five years&#8217; time, who knows what it could have become. Incidentally, it looks like the website is being updated, but, it should be pointed out, not by your ex-Liverpool.com team. Best stick to reading this blog instead then!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

